POWER AND POLITICAL ORGANIZATION OF ANTI-CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF FORMATION OF THE FOREIGN POLICY IDENTITY OF THE STATE

  • I Tsyrfa Institute of International Relations of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Abstract

On the basis of distinguishing the main features of public administration and interaction between the state and society in the period of a complex multi-level systemic crisis, the essence of the power and political organization of anti-crisis management in the
Actual problems of international relations. Release 135. 2018
50
context of formation of the foreign policy identity of Ukraine is determined. Stable interrelations between the state and society are revealed to play the key role in the process of the foreign policy identification of an actor nowadays.
The historical features and relevant social and spiritual values of the society are proved to be decisive determinants while building the foreign policy identity of the state. They form key identity markers that the state extrapolates into the external space. This process provides a comparable stability of the foreign policy identity of an actor when implementing its foreign policy and during its interactions with other subjects of the world politics.
The anti-crisis management on the state level is determined to be currently carried out within the general system integrity, which functioning is conditioned by the natural and geographic, social and economic, political and spiritual and moral systems. Interaction with these systems provides implementation of the anti-crisis management inside the state. In this sense, the most important role is played not only by the institutionalization of the power and political organization of anti-crisis management, but also by the formation of spatial images that contribute to the formation of the foreign policy identity of the state on the international arena.
Key words: Ukraine, foreign policy identity, anti-crisis management, socium, identity markers, spatial image.

Author Biography

I Tsyrfa, Institute of International Relations of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Ph.D. in Political Science, Assistant Professor of the Chair of International Regional Studies

References

References

Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Ievropeiskym Soiuzom, Ievropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony, vid 27 chervnia 2014 roku [Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one

Actual problems of international relations. Release 135. 2018

part, and Ukraine, of the other part, 27 June 2014]. Available at: <http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011>

Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy No. 254k/96-vr vid 28 chervnia 1996 roku [Constitution of Ukraine: The Law of Ukraine No. 254k/96-vr, 28 June 1996]. Available at: <http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80/page>

Pro Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy No. 794-VII vid 27 liutoho 2014 roku [On the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine: The Law of Ukraine No. 794-VII, 27 February 2014]. Available at: <http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/794-18/page>

Atamanchuk G. V. (1990) Obespechenie ratsionalnosti gosudarstvennogo upravleniia [Ensuring the rationality of public administration]. Moskva: Yurid. lit.

Guliev M. A., Sagova L. A. (2008) Sotsialno-tekhnologicheskie resursy upravleniia postindustrialnogo obshchestva: opyt sistemnogo analiza [Social and technological resources of the postindustrial society management: Experience of the system analysis]. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks.

Kerimov D. A. (2007) Sovremennoe gosudarstvo: voprosy teorii [The modern state: Theory issues]. Moskva: Norma.

Kondratiev N. D. (2002) Bolshie tsikly koniunktury i teoriia predvideniia. Izbrannye trudy [Big cycles of conjuncture and foresight theory. Selected works]. Moskva: ZAO «Izdatelstvo «Ekonomika».

Kutsenko V. I., Garashchuk O. V. (2011) ‘Sotsializatsiia ekonomiky – shliakh do staloho rozvytku ta vysokoi yakosti zhyttia’ [Socialization of the economy is the way to sustainable development and high quality of life], Ekonomika i upravlinnia [Economics and Management] 2: 25–33.

Liubashits V. Ya. (2004) Evoliutsiia gosudarstva kak instituta politicheskoi sistemy [Evolution of the state as an institute of the political system]. Rostov-na-Donu: Izdatelstvo SKNCVSh.

Makarychev A. S. (2003) ‘Globalnoe i lokalnoe: meniaiushchaiasia rol gosudarstva v upravlenii prostranstvennym razvitiem’ [Global and local: Changing role of the state in the management of spatial development], Politicheskaia nauka [Political Science] 3: 8–27.

Mamut L. S. (1998) Gosudarstvo v tsennostnom izmerenii [The state in the value-based dimension]. Moskva: NORMA.

Melnychenko O. A. (2015) ‘Antykryzova polityka derzhavy: sutnist ta priorytetni napriamy’ [Anti-crisis policy of the state: The essence and priority directions], Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia: zb. nauk. pr. [Theory and Practice of Public Administration: Collected scientific papers] 2 (49): 17–24. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo KharRI NADU «Mahistr».

Mishin A. A. (1996) Konstitutsionnoe (gosudarstvennoe) pravo zarubezhnykh stran [Constitutional (state) law of the foreign countries]. Moskva: Belye alvy.

Mordovtsev A. Yu., Popov V. V. (2007) Rossiiskii pravovoi mentalitet [The Russian legal mentality]. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo YuFU.

Oskovskyi V. (2010) ‘Pro ekonomichnu polityku staloho rozvytku v Ukraini’ [Revisiting the economic policy of sustainable development in Ukraine], Ekonomika Ukrainy [Economy of Ukraine] 6: 4–13.

Slizkova G. V. (2012) ‘Kryzovi yavyshcha v systemi derzhavnoho upravlinnia Ukrainy: prychyny vynyknennia, rozvytok, shliakhy podolannia’ [Crisis phenomena in the system of the public administration of Ukraine: Causes of origin, development, and ways of overcoming], Visnyk KNUTD [Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design] 2: 137–142. Seriia «Problemy ekonomiky organizacii ta upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy» [Series ‘Problems of the economy of organizations and management of the enterprises’].

Актуальні проблеми міжнародних відносин. Випуск 135. 2018. .

Smorgunov L. V. (2004) ‘Problema sootnosheniia politiki i upravleniia v sovremennoi politicheskoi i administrativnoi nauke’ [The problem of the correlation between the politics and management in the modern political and administrative science], in V. S. Komarovskii, L. V. Smorgunov (eds.) Politiko-administrativnoe upravlenie [Political and administrative management], pp. 21–34. Moskva: Izd-vo RAGS.

Fukuyama F. (2006) Silnoe gosudarstvo: upravlenie i mirovoi poriadok v XXI veke [A strong state: Governance and world order in the 21st century]. Moskva: AST: AST MOSKVA: KHRANITEL.

Castles F. G. (2009) The social democratic image of society (Routledge revivals): A study of the achievements and origins of Scandinavian social democracy in comparative perspective. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Delaney С., Kaspin D. (2011) Investigating culture: An experiential introduction to anthropology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Flockhart T. (2005) Socializing democratic norms: The role of international organizations for the construction of Europe. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan.

Philosophy and politics: A commentary on the preface to Hegel’s philosophy of right (1987), Peperzak A. T. (ed.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Porter B. N. (1993) Images, power, and politics: Figurative aspects of Esarhaddon’s Babylonian policy. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.

Revel J. (2009) ‘Identity, nature, life: Three biopolitical deconstructions’, Theory, Culture & Society 26(6): 45–54.

Published
2018-10-07