STATE SYMBOL OF RUSSIA AND ALBANIA: COMPARATIVE ASPECT

Abstract

The purpose of this research is a comparative description of the visual features of the national flags of Russia and Albania as symbols of diffusion of macroidentity, which is expressed in the contradictory vectors of their foreign policy and focus on both European and Asian macroidentity. Based on color semantics, the article analyzes the state flags of Russia and Albania, which, as in state symbols, reveal the features of the geopolitical positioning of states. The connection between the axial symbol of identity – the double-headed eagle – and the bifurcation (diffuseness) of political macroidentity is shown. The features common to the two states are shown: a tendency toward geopolitical isolationism, authoritarian state power, the dependence of the institution of the church on the state and statist atheism, the prevalence of corrupt practices, the emphasis on forced modernization and extraordinary technologies for overcoming situations of foreign political challenges. It is stated that in both countries there is a corruption of power, a sign of which is a fierce struggle for power during most of Byzantine history. It was determined that this struggle was not waged by political methods, but by force – a military coup, uprising or assassination of the current head of state. In the geopolitical position of Albania, this was due to Skannerberg’s attempt to combine two in one: Islamic and Orthodox identities, as well as situational adaptation of the country’s political elite to the next occupier: from 1443, i.e. the years of struggle against Turkish rule and until 1944 the coat of arms acquired alternately Turkish, Austrian, Greek, Italian and Soviet-Russian details. The coat of arms of the Russian Federation also contains Byzantine elements, which indicates a spiritual succession with the Byzantine Empire, however, with less borrowing.
Key words: Russia, Albania, the national flag of Russia, the national flag of Albania, geopolitical isolationism, autarky, diffusion of macroidentity.

References 1. Албанский фактор кризиса на Балканах: Сборник обзоров и статей / Гуськова Е.Ю. (отв. ред.) (2002). [Albanian crisis factor in the Balkans: Collection of reviews and articles]. Москва: ИНИОН РАН. 2. Арш Г.Л., Сенкевич И.Г., Смирнова Н.Д. (1965) Краткая история Албании [A Brief History of Albania]. Москва: Наука.
3. Гилинский Я. (2004) Девиантология: социология преступности, наркотизма, проституции, самоубийств и других “отклонений” [Deviantology: the sociology of crime, narcotism, prostitution, suicide and other “deviations”]. Санкт-Петербург: Издательство “Юридический центр Пресс”. 4. Павлова-Сильванская М.П. (1999) ‘Три века отечественных реформ’ [Three centuries of domestic reforms], Pro et Contra 4 (3): 211-213. 5. Пантин В.И. (1997) Циклы и волны модернизации как феномен социального развития [Cycles and waves of modernization as a phenomenon of social development]. Москва: Московский философский фонд. 6. Романенко Ю.В. (2017) Осевые символы идентичности в государственной атрибутике [Axial symbols of identity in state attributes]. Киев: Меркьюри-Подолье. 7. Смирнова Н.Д. (2003) История Албании в XX веке [History of Albania in the 20th century]. Москва: Наука.
Актуальні проблеми міжнародних відносин. Випуск 141. 2019. .
37
8. Этническая идентичность: социосистемологическое измерение геополитики. Романенко Ю.В. (ред.-коорд.) (2016) [Ethnic Identity: The Sociological Dimension of Geopolitics]. Киев: Меркьюри-Подолье. 9. Bogdani M., Loughlin J. (2007) Albania and the European Union. London-New York: Oxford University Press. 10. Blumer H. (1935) The Human Side of Social Planning. New York: Univ.-Press. 11. Blumer H. (1937) Social Psychology, Chapter 4 in Emerson. Peter Schmidt (ed.) Man and Society: A Substantive Introduction to the Social Science. New York: Prentice-Hall. 12. Blumer H. (1939) Critiques of Research in the Social Sciences: An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s “The Polish Peasant in Europe and America”. New York: Prentice-Hall. 13. Blumer H. (1969) Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method. New York: Prentice-Hall. 14. Joas H. (1993) Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
15. Levi-Strauss Claude. (2005) Biography. Dictionary of Literary Biography on Claude Levi-Strauss, <http://www.bookrags.com/biography/claude-levi-strauss-dlb/#gsc.tab=0> 16. Levi-Strauss Claude. (1963) Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books. 17. Moore Jerry D. (2009) Visions of Culture: An Introduction to Anthropological Theories and Theorists. Lanham-New York-Toronto: AltaMira Press. 18. Pearson O. (2006) Albania in the Twentieth Century: A History. Vol. III: Albania as Dictatorship and Democracy. From Isolation to the Kosovo War 1946-1998. London-New York: Bloomsbury Academic. 19. Vilinbakhov G. (1998) ‘The Fate of the Double-Headed Eagle’, Moscow Magazine May/June: 28-31. 20. Van Den Heydt V. (1976) Prospects for the Soul: Soundings in Jungian psychology and religion. London: Barton, Longman and Todd. 21. Waal de C. (2005) Albania Today: A Portrait of Post-Communist Turbulence. London-New York: I.B. Tauris. 22. Weyss N. (1991) ‘Der Doppeladler Geschichte eines Symbols’, Adler Bd. 16 (XXX). Janner/Marz: 78-81.