• A Filipenko Institute of International Relations of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv


The article investigates the main approaches in the field of economic methodology. There are two methodological trends that emerged under the philosophy of science: naturalistic and constructivist. The first originates from Aristotle’s materialism, the second – from Plato’s ideas. Naturalized approaches eliminates distinction between the “context of discovery” and the “context of justification”. Constructivism related to cognitive methodological paradigm.

It means that it is more sociological in nature, concerned with connections between individuals – with learning, inter-subjectivity, and social knowledge. Thus, the main methodological views on economic theory can, on the one hand, explain the economic life in all its dimensions – the micro – macro – and geo-economic levels, establish certain patterns and trends. On the other hand, using a variety of methods – logical, mathematical, statistical, computer models and programs, new phenomena and processes of local or global nature are explored. That creates conditions for accumulation of empirical and theoretical material that enriches the economic theory, generally shaping the economic science.

Author Biography

A Filipenko, Institute of International Relations of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor of the Department of World Economy and International Economic Relations


Blaug, M. (2004). Metodologiya ekonomicheskoj nauki, ili Kak ekonomisty obyasnyayut [The methodology of economic science, or How economists explain]: per. s angl. Moskva. (In Russian).

Kirdina, S. (2013). Metodologicheskiy individualizm i metodologicheskiy institucionalizm [Methodological individualism and methodological institutionalism]. Voprosy ekonomiki – Issues of economics, 10. (In Russian).

Polanyi, K. (2002). Velikaya transformaciya: politicheskie i ekonomicheskie istoki nashego vremeni [The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time]: per. s angl. Sankt-Peterburg. (In Russian).

Smit, V. (2008).Eksperimentalnaya ekonomika [Experimental economics]: per. s angl. Moskva. (In Russian).

Filosofiya nauki: Epistemologiya. Metodologiya. Kultura [Philosophy of Science: Epistemology. Methodology. Culture]: chrestomatiya. (2006). Moskva. P. 368. (In Russian).

Frolov, D. (2008). Metodologicheskiy institucionalizm: novyi vzgyad na evolyuciyu ekonomicheskoy nauki [Methodological Institutionalism: A New Perspective on the Evolution of Economic Science]. Voprosy ekonomiki – Issues of economics, 11. (In Russian).

Habermas Ju. (1990). Poznanie i interes [Cognition and interest]. Filosofskie nauki, 1, 91. (In Russian).

Hausman, D. (1994). Ekonomicheskaya metodologiya v dvuch slovach [Economic methodology in a two words]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2. (In Russian).

Shchedrovickiy, P. G. (2007). Izmeneniya v myshlenii na rubezhe XXI stoletiya: socio-kulturnye vyzovy [Changes in thinking at the turn of the XXI century: socio-cultural challenges.]. Voprosy filosofii – Problems of philosophy, 7, 39–40. (In Russian).

Backhouse R. E. Methodology in: action in Journal of economic methodology, Vol.17, Nr. 1, March, 2010.

Baumans M., Davis J. B. Economic methodology. Understanding economic as a science. – New York, 2010.

Cohen B. Advanced introduction to international political economy. – Cheltenham, 2014.

Dopfer K. Economics in cultural key; complexity and evolution revisited in: The Elgar companion to recent economic methodology / Ed. by Davis J. B., and Hands D. W. – Cheltenham, 2011.

Duppe T. How economic methodology became a separate science in: Journal of economic methodology, Vol.18, Nr. 2, June, 2011.

Farmer J. D. Hypothesis non fingo: problems with the scientific method in economics in: Journal of economic methodology, Vol. 20, Nr. 4, 2013.

Friedman M. The methodology of positive economics in: The Methodology of positive economics. Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy / Ed. by Maki U. – Cambridge University press, 2009.

Hands D. W. Deweyan pragmatic philosophy and contemporary economic methodology in: Dewey, pragmatism, and economic methodology / Ed. by Khalil E. L. – London and New York, 2004.

Herfeld K. The world in axioms: an interview with Patrick Suppes in: Journal of economic methodology, Vol. 23, Nr 3, September , 2016.

Hoffmann Th. S.Wirtschaftsphilosophie. Ansatze und Perspektiven von der Antike bis heute. – Wiesbaden, 2009.

Keizer P. Multidisciplinary economics. A methodological account. – Oxford University press, 2015.

Krol Z. Platonism and the development of mathematics. Infinity and geometry. – Warszawa, 2015.

Moses J. W., Knutsen T. L. Ways of knowing. Competing methodologies in social and political research. Second edition. – London, 2012.

Mulberg J. Social limits to economic theory. – London and New York, 1995.

Perry 6 and Ch. Bellamy. Principles of methodology. Research design in social science. – Los Angeles, 2012.

Robbins L. The nature and significance of economic science in: The philosophy of economics. An Antology / Ed. by Hausman D. – Cambridge University press, 2008.

Sen A. The idea of justice. – London, 2009.

The philosophy of economics. An Anthology. Third edition / Ed. by Hausman D. M. – Cambridge University press, 2008.

Williamson O. Pragmatic methodology; a sketch with applications to transactions cost economics in: Journal of economic methodology, Vol.16, Nr. 2, June, 2009.

Wren-Lewis S. Internal consistency, price rigidity and the microfoundations of macroeconomics in: Journal of economic methodology, Vol. 18. Nr. 2, June, 2011.