DIGITAL TRANSFORMATIONS AS A DRIVER OF CHANGES IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: CONTRADICTORY AND ASYMMETRIC CHARACTER OF DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE DIGITAL RECONFIGURATION OF ECONOMIC SECURITY

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to substantiate the theoretical interpretation of digital transformations as a contradictory and asymmetric driver of socio-economic development that penetrates all traditional dimensions of economic security and converts digital security and cybersecurity into its constitutive mechanisms, and to demonstrate that the balance between strengthening and undermining economic security is determined not by technologies as such but by the configuration of regulatory and institutional frameworks of digital security, cybersecurity, and antimonopoly policy. The article proposes a conceptual framework that interprets digital transformation not as a linear modernization process but as a permanent multi-vector restructuring that penetrates the food, energy, and financial dimensions of economic security from within, transforming them through digital tools and platforms, with the consequence that traditional dimensions of economic security cannot be analytically separated from the digital contour without losing the substance of the analysis. The thesis of the contradictory and asymmetric character of digital development is substantiated, according to which the same technological foundation simultaneously expands the space of market opportunities and produces new forms of concentration of economic power, with benefits concentrated in a narrow circle of actors and risks dispersed across a broad base of participants, which transforms the question of the overall impact of digitalization on socio-economic development into a question of differentiated analysis of distributional outcomes for various groups of actors. Digital competition is analysed as a meta-mechanism of redistribution of economic power through such forms as platform competition, coopetition, escalation model, and algorithmic collusion, which together form a new matrix of threats to economic security and require a fundamental rethinking of antimonopoly policy. Digital stratification is examined as an endogenous factor that undermines economic security from within the national economic space through the erosion of the tax base, labour market, consumer demand, and fiscal capacity of the national state, while digital agents and artificial intelligence are interpreted as a new frontier of systemic risks of economic security that require the formation of international mechanisms of risk management going beyond the traditional regulatory toolkit.

References:

Acemoglu, D. (2024). The simple macroeconomics of AI (NBER Working Paper No. 32487). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w32487/w32487.pdf

Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488–1542. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160696

Assad, S., Clark, R., Ershov, D., & Xu, L. (2024). Algorithmic pricing and competition: Empirical evidence from the German retail gasoline market. Journal of Political Economy, 132(3), 723–771.

Bengio, Y., Hinton, G., Yao, A., Song, D., Abbeel, P., Darrell, T., Harari, Y. N., Zhang, Y. Q., Xue, L., Shalev-Shwartz, S., Hadfield, G., Clune, J., Maharaj, T., Hutter, F., Baydin, A. G., McIlraith, S., Gao, Q., Acharya, A., Krueger, D., & Mindermann, S. (2024). Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress. Science, 384(6698), 842–845. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn0117

Brynjolfsson, E., Chandar, B., & Chen, R. (2025). Canaries in the coal mine? Six facts about the recent employment effects of artificial intelligence (SIEPR Working Paper). Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/working-paper/canaries-coal-mine-six-facts-about-recent-employment-effects-artificial

Calvano, E., Calzolari, G., Denicolò, V., & Pastorello, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence, algorithmic pricing, and collusion. American Economic Review, 110(10), 3267–3297. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190623

Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2024). GPTs are GPTs: Labour market impact potential of LLMs. Science, 384(6702), 1306–1308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj0998

Goldman Sachs Research. (2025). The potentially large effects of artificial intelligence on economic growth. GS Global Economics Research. https://www.gspublishing.com/content/research/en/reports/2023/03/27/d64e052b-0f6e-45d7-967b-d7be35fabd16.html

International Energy Agency. (2025). Electricity 2025. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2025

Korinek, A. (2024). Economic policy challenges for the age of AI (NBER Working Paper No. 32980). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w32980

Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2021). Artificial intelligence, globalization, and strategies for economic development (NBER Working Paper No. 28453). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w28453

McKinsey Global Institute. (2025). Agents, robots, and us: Skill partnerships in the age of AI. MGI Report.

OECD. (2024). OECD digital economy outlook 2024: Volume 1. Embracing the technology frontier. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a1689dc5-en

Ozkan, S., & Sullivan, N. (2025, August 26). Is AI contributing to rising unemployment? Evidence from occupational variation. On the Economy Blog, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2025/aug/is-ai-contributing-unemployment-evidence-occupational-variation

Panchenko, V., & Oliinyk, K. (2025a). Tsyfrovyzatsiia yak vyklyk spilnomu dobrobutu: u poshukakh alternatyvnykh pidkhodiv do interpretatsii tsyfrovoi nerivnosti [Digitalization as a challenge to shared prosperity: In search of alternative approaches to interpreting digital inequality]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, (17), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2025.17.90

Panchenko, V., & Oliinyk, K. (2025b). Digital gentrification as a sign of new inequality in the conditions of socio-spatial transformations. Actual Problems of International Relations, 1(163), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.17721/apmv.2025.163.1.124-133

Panchenko, V., & Oliinyk, K. (2025c). Kontseptualni pidkhody do doslidzhennia vplyvu protsesiv tsyfrovoi transformatsii na hlobalne biznes-seredovyshche [Conceptual approaches to researching the impact of digital transformation processes on the global business environment]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, (18), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2025.18.660

Panchenko, V., & Oliinyk, K. (2025d). Transformatsiinyi potentsial tsyfrovoi ekonomiky ta Industry 4.0 dlia innovatsiinoho й promysovoho rozvytku ta ekonomichnoi nerivnosti [Transformation potential of the digital economy and Industry 4.0 for innovative and industrial development and economic inequality]. Ahrosvit, (17), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2025.17.57

Reznikova, N., Bulatova, O., Panchenko, V., & Ivashchenko, O. (2023). Tsyfrova transformatsiia rynku pratsi: platformna ekonomika i novi zahrozy nerivnosti v umovakh tekhnohlobalizmu [Digital transformation of the labour market: Platform economy and new threats of inequality under technoglobalism]. Ahrosvit, (18), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2023.18.33

Reznikova, N., Bulatova, O., Ptashchenko, O., Ivashchenko, O., & Panchenko, V. (2023). Z-owning and Z-consumption in the conditions of movement from shareholder to stakeholder capitalism: Values as the basis of self-identification. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, (5), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2023.5.28

Reznikova, N., Chugaiev, O., Bulatova, O., & Ptashchenko, O. (2023). Z-inequality in the context of the formation of a digital society: Intergenerational differences in the perception of new threats to economic security. Actual Problems of International Relations, 1(156), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.17721/apmv.2023.156.1.46-58

Reznikova, N., Karp, V., & Ivashchenko, O. (2023). Mizhnarodnyi dosvid instytutsiinoho spryiannia rozvytku tsyfrovoi ekonomiky i protydii zahrozam tekhnohlobalizmu v umovakh innovatsiinoho supernytstva [International experience of institutional support for digital economy development and counteracting technoglobalism threats in the context of innovation rivalry]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, (17), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2023.17.5

Reznikova, N., Ptashchenko, O., & Ptashchenko, L. (2025). Beyond Industry 4.0 and competition: Data and information technology markets as a battlefield for digital leadership. Actual Problems of International Relations, 1(163), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.17721/apmv.2025.163.1.152-166

Shahidi, P., Rusak, G., Manning, B., Fradkin, A., & Horton, J. J. (2025). The Coasean singularity? Demand, supply, and market design with AI agents (NBER Working Paper No. 34468). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Trammell, P., & Korinek, A. (2023). Economic growth under transformative AI (NBER Working Paper No. 31815). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w32487/w31815.pdf

World Economic Forum. (2025a). The future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum. (2025b). Global economic futures: Competitiveness in 2030 (White Paper). World Economic Forum.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Received: 14.05.26 / Revised: 24.05.26 / Accepted: 06.06.26 / Published: 30.06.26