GREENLAND IN THE US NATIONAL DEFENCE STRATEGY 2026

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the strategic conceptualisation of Greenland in the US National Defence Strategy 2026. It examines the transformation of the United States' approach to the Arctic region in the context of growing geopolitical competition, increased military activity by the Russian Federation and the strengthening of the economic presence of the People's Republic of China. It has been established that Greenland is institutionalised in the strategy as a ‘key terrain,’ guaranteed access to which is considered a component of US territorial defence and an element of continental security in the Western Hemisphere, aligning with the "Trump Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine". Using qualitative and quantitative content analysis of the strategy text, it was determined that the island is mentioned five times in the document in the context of ensuring military and commercial access to strategically important areas. This indicates that Greenland has been established as a structural element of modern American defence planning, particularly involving critical assets like the Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) for early warning systems. Particular attention is paid to the international consequences of this approach. The reaction of the Kingdom of Denmark, the European Union and NATO to the strengthening of the island's strategic status has been analysed. It has been found that Denmark responded by asserting its sovereign control and significantly boosting its Arctic defense spending by 12–15 billion DKK (over $1.6 billion USD) in 2026, aimed at modernizing infrastructure such as adapting civilian airports in Nuuk to support F-35 fighter jets. It is concluded that the rethinking of Greenland's role in 2026 reflects a broader process of integrating the Arctic space into national and collective security systems, which is shaping a new configuration of strategic interests in the North Atlantic.

References:

Arctic Council. (2021). Arctic climate change update 2021. https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/952ce558-b096-458c-9bed-89e1cc9129ba/content

Brady, A.-M. (2017). China as a polar great power. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/china-as-a-polar-great-power/22493FFC041E6739DAED329CCB71F688

Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://www.academia.edu/40550487/Kupdf_net_buzan_barry_security_a_new_framework_for_analysis

European Commission. (2021). Multiannual indicative programme for Greenland 2021–2027. https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/countries/greenland_en

European Commission. (2023). Critical raw materials act. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/raw-materials/areas-specific-interest/critical-raw-materials_en

Hubinko, A. V. (2025). Pravovyi status Hrenlandii yak chynnyk suchasnoi mizhnarodnoi polityky [The legal status of Greenland as a factor in modern international politics]. Naukovi zapysky. Mizhnarodne pravo; pravo Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Scientific Notes. International Law; European Union Law], 18, 220–226.

IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/

Marchenko, I. S. (2025). Vektory zovnishnoi polityky SShA v umovakh trampizmu: Zmina stratehichnykh priorytetiv [Vectors of US foreign policy under Trumpism: Change of strategic priorities]. Politykus [Politicus], 30, 181–187.

Ministry of Defence of Denmark. (2023). Agreement on strengthening Arctic capabilities. https://www.fmn.dk/globalassets/fmn/dokumenter/nyheder/2021/-factsheet-agreement-on-arctic-capabilities-.pdf

NATO. (2022). NATO 2022 strategic concept. https://www.act.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/290622-strategic-concept.pdf

NATO. (2023). Finland joins NATO as 31st ally. NATO. https://www.nato.int/en/news-and-events/articles/news/2023/04/04/finland-joins-nato-as-31st-ally

Reuters. (2025). Denmark to boost Arctic defence spending. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/denmark-announces-21-bln-arctic-military-investment-plan-2025-01-27/

Tamnes, R. (1991). The United States and the Cold War in the High North. Ad Notam. https://tidsskrift.dk/politica/article/download/69399/101303

U.S. Department of Defense. (2001). DOD dictionary of military and associated terms. https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/B9/B9875E9C2553D81D1D6E0523563F8D72_DoD_Dictionary_of_Military_Terms.pdf

U.S. Department of Defense. (2026). National defense strategy of the United States of America 2026. https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/23/2003864773/-1/-1/0/2026-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY.PDF

U.S. Department of State. (1951). Agreement relating to the defense of Greenland, April 27, 1951. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/04-806-Denmark-Defense.done_.pdf

U.S. Geological Survey. (2008). Circum-Arctic resource appraisal. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/2008-circum-arctic-resource-appraisal

U.S. Geological Survey. (2023). Mineral commodity summaries 2023. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2023/mcs2023.pdf

U.S. Space Force. (n.d.). Pituffik Space Base (Greenland). https://www.petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil/Pituffik-SB-Greenland/dvpTag/USSF/

Yale Law School, Avalon Project. (1941). Agreement relating to the defense of Greenland, April 9, 1941. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/den001.asp

Zan, M. P. (2025). Hrenlandiia yak etnichna terytorialna avtonomiia Korolivstva Danii [Greenland as an ethnic territorial autonomy of the Kingdom of Denmark]. In Politychni protsesy suchasnosti: hlobalnyi ta rehionalni vymiry [Modern political processes: Global and regional dimensions] (Proceedings of the VI International Scientific-Practical Conference, Ivano-Frankivsk, April 8–9, 2025).

Received: 08.05.26 / Revised: 22.05.26 / Accepted: 01.06.26 / Published: 30.06.26