• O. І. Shnyrkov Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
  • O. А. Chugaiev Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv


The purpose of research is to analyze the reasons and effects of disintegration with Russia for Ukraine and its association with the EU. Expected results of the Association Agreement with the EU and conflict with Russia in previous research are compared with the actual effects.

Export losses of the opposing countries from the economic conflict are calculated and compared. The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement has marked the choice of Ukraine to follow the European social and economic development model. It aimed at decreasing trade barriers, making reforms and engaging Ukraine in international production networks by foreign investment inflows. But the EU and Ukraine did not foresee the severe economic, political and military reaction of Russia, which is a barrier to efficient implementation of the Association Agreement. Decrease in exports to Russia and other CIS countries has not been offset by better access to the EU market. Severe reaction of Russia is politically motivated and is not substantiated economically. All the conflicting parties faced losses from the economic war. Ukraine and Russia were the most affected countries, while Western countries faced minor losses. Restoring cooperation and integration is not possible without changes in foreign policy of Russia or / and other parties.

Author Biographies

O. І. Shnyrkov, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of World Economy and International Economic Relations
O. А. Chugaiev, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
PhD (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of World Economy and International Economic Relations



European Atomic Energy Community; European Union; The Member States; Ukraine (2014) Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine of the other part, <>

Беррес Л. (2014) ‘Украина пугает нестрашными санкциями’ [Ukraine frightens with unscary sanctions], Московский комсомолец, 167: 2.

Будкін В. С. (2014) ‘Геополітичні та геоекономічні наслідки Російсько-Українського конфлікту’ [Geopolitical and geoeconomic consequences of the Conflict between Russia and Ukraine], Актуальні проблеми міжнародних відносин 121(І): 201-209.

Бураковський І. et al. (2016) Біла книга. Як реалізувати експортний потенціал України за умов глобалізації. Пропозиції щодо політики сприяння розвитку українського експорту [White book. How to apply export potential of Ukraine under globalization. Proposals for Ukrainian export development facilitation policy]. Київ : Інститут економічних досліджень і політичних консультацій, АО «АФ «Сергій Козьяков та Партнери», <>

РБК daily (2014) ‘Цена экономической войны’ [Price of economic war], РБК daily 221: 3.

Ткачев И., Сухаревская А. (2014) ‘Холодная экономическая война’ [Cold economic war], РБК daily 242: 8.

Ческидов Б. М. (2014) ‘Применение экономических санкций и принципы минимизации их воздействия’ [Using economic sanctions and the principles of minimizing their impact], Финансы 11: 11-16.

Шинкарук Л. В. (2014) ‘Економічний вимір участі України в інтеграційних процесах’ [Economic dimention of Ukjraine’s participation in integration processes], Вісник Національної академії наук України 5: 56-61.

Baldacchino G., Bertram G. (2009) ‘The Beak of the Finch: Insights into the Economic Development of Small Economies’, The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs 98 (401): 141-160, <http://doi:10.1080/00358530902757867>

Brenton P. (2000) Trade Policies in the EU and Ukraine: Implications for a Free Trade Agreement, Prepared under EES Project UK 26: Study on the economic feasibility, general economic impact and implications of a free trade agreement between the European Union and Ukraine according to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. Brussels.

ECORYS (2010) Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment for the FTA between the EU and Ukraine within the Enhanced Agreement. Rotterdam.

Emerson M. (2014) Trade Policy Issues in the Wider Europe – that Led to War and not yet to Peace, CEPS working document (398). Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.

Emerson M., Movchan V., eds. (2016). Deepening EU-Ukrainian Relations. What, Why and How? Brussels, London, Kyiv: Centre for European Policy Studies, Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting, Rowman & Littlefield International.

Emerson, M. et al. (2006) The Prospects of Deep Free Trade between the European Union and Ukraine. Brussels: Center for European Policy Studies.

Frey M., Olekseyuk-Viber Z. (n.d.) Effects of Trade Liberalization between the EU and Ukraine in a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model, <>

Havlik P. (2014) ‘Vilnius Eastern Partnership Summit: Milestone in EU-Russia Relations – not just for Ukraine’, Danube: Law and Economic Review (5): 21-51, <http://doi:10.2478/danb-2014-0002>

Hufbauer G. C., Schott J. J., Elliott K. A., Oegg B. (2007). Economic Sanctions Reconsidered. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institution for International Economics.

International Monetary Fund (2016) World Economic Outlook Database, April 2016 Edition, <>

International Monetary Fund (n.d.) Direction of Trade Statistics, <>

Kulik S., Spartak A., Vinokurov E., Yurgens I. (2014) Two Integration Projects in Europe: Dead End of Struggle. MPRA Paper (61636), <>

Maliszewska M., Orlova I., Taran S. (2011) ‘Deep Integration with the EU: Impact on Selected ENP Countries and Russia’, in: M. Dabrowski, M. Maliszewsk (eds.) EU Eastern Neighbourhood: Economic Potential and Future Development. Berlin: Springer.

Movchan V., Shportyuk V. (2011) ‘Between Two Unions: Optimal Regional Integration Strategy for Ukraine’, Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the European Trade Study Group (ETSG), Copenhagen, 8–10 September 2011. (13th : 2011 : Copenhagen, Denmark). Copenhagen: ETSG, 2011.

Oxford Economics (2012) The Impact of an FTA between Ukraine and the EU, Prepared for the Foundation for Effective Governance. Oxford.

Sharov O. (2015) Economy of the EU: Sanctions against Russia and their Reverse Effect, Journal of European Economy 14(2): 166-182.

Shepotylo O. (2010). A Gravity Model of net Benefits of EU Membership: the case of Ukraine, Journal of Economic Integration 25(4): 676-702.

Shnyrkov O. I., Rogach O. I., Chugaiev O. A. (2015) ‘Russia’s Concerns for the EU-Ukraine Association: Myths and Realities’, Journal Global Policy and Governance 4 (20): 33-49 <http://doi10.14666/2194-7759-4-2-002>

State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016) Statistical Information <>

The Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting (2011) Ukraine’s Trade Policy Choice: Pros and Cons of Different Regional Integration Options. Kyiv, <>

World Trade Organization (n.d.) Tariff Profiles, <>

World Trade Organization (2016) Trade Policy Review Report by Ukraine, <>

UNCTADStat (2016) Trade Structure by Partner, Product or Service-Category, <>