FOREIGN TRADE REGULATION IN THE ECONOMY OF SMALL AND BIG COUNTRIES

Authors

  • O. A. Chugaiev Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/apmv.2016.127.1.128-137

Abstract

Size of economy is a factor of international trade regulation. We systematize the effects described in existing research works. Size of economy influences export and import priorities of foreign trade policy, efficiency of tariff regulation or tariff liberalization, sophistication of customs procedures, indirect tax rates for imports, prevalence of subsidies and trade remedies, importance of foreign trade taxes for the government revenues, opportunities and stimuli for trade disputes and wars. It is more difficult for small countries to carry out import
substitution policy. In small countries tariff regulation is less efficient, considering the absence of the terms of trade effect and market competition deterioration. But under larger trade openness customs tariffs are more important for the state budget of small countries. Non-tariff regulation is more sophisticated in large countries. The balance of economic stimuli and opportunities in trade wars and disputes is not favorable for middle-sized economies. We extrapolate the abovementioned effects to Ukraine as a middle-sized economy. This allows us to provide recommendations for its foreign trade policy: differentiated trade liberalization, dependence of the optimal foreign trade taxation level on trade openness and trade balance, collective trade sanctions.

Key words: country size, size of economy, international trade, foreign trade regulation, trade disputes.

Author Biography

  • O. A. Chugaiev, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

    PhD in Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of World Economy and International Economic Relations of Institute of International Relations of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

References

Streeten P. The Special Problems of Small Countries / P. Streeten // World Development. – 1993. – Vol. 21. – № 2. – P. 197-202. – Cited by: Nyamtseren L. Challenges and Opportunities of Small Countries for Integration into the Global Economy, as a Case of Mongolia :

Dresden discussion paper in economics № 13/04 / Lhamsuren Nyamtseren. – Dresden: Dresden University of Technology, 2004. – 45 p.

Joson S. S. Substitutability of «Buy Local» Policy for Tariff Protection in Small Economies // Working papers in Economics (University of Sydney. Department of Economics). – 1985. – № 78. – P. 1-27.

Gonzales A. P. Trade and Integration Dialogue: Trade Liberalization and Small Economies / Anthony Peter Gonzales. – Washington D.С. : Inter-American Development Bank, 2001. – 28 p.

Felbermayr G. Optimal Tariffs, Retaliation and the Welfare Loss from Tariff Wars in the Melitz Model : Working Paper № 3474 / Gabriel Felbermayr, Benjamin Jung, Mario Larch. – Munich: CESifo Group, 2011. – 35 p.

Nyamtseren L. Challenges and Opportunities of Small Countries for Integration into the Global Economy, as a Case of Mongolia : Dresden discussion paper in economics № 13/04/ Lhamsuren Nyamtseren. – Dresden : Dresden University of Technology, 2004. – 45 p.

Hoekman B. Markups, Entry Regulation, and Trade: Does Country Size Matter?: Policy Research Working paper № 2662 / Bernard Hoekman, Hiau Looi Kee, Marcelo Olarreaga. – Washington D. С. : World Bank, Trade, Development Research Group, 2001. – 37 p.

Toshimitsu T. Should a Large Country Sustain Laissez Faire in the Long-Run? : Discussion paper № 18 / Tsuyoshi Toshimitsu. – Nishinomiya : School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, 1997. – 21 p.

World Bank World Development Indicators [Electronic Resource]. – The World Bank, December, 2015. – Mode of Access: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-develop-

ment-indicators.

Paizs L. Asymmetric Competition in the Setting of Diesel Excise Taxes in EU Countries : Discussion paper MT-DP – 2010/12 / László Paizs. – Budapest: Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 2010. – 33 p.

Behar A. Exports and Logistics: Discussion paper № 439 / Alberto Behar, Phil Manners and Benjamin D. Nelson. – Oxford : Oxford University, Department of Economics, 2009. – 21, iv p.

Readiness of Small Countries to Participate in the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA).

– Mexico: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, 1996. – 93 p.

Amin M. Trade Facilitation and Country Size : CES Working Paper № 2012.45 / Mohammad Amin, Jamal Ibrahim Haidar. – Paris: Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne? 2012. – 25 p.

Small States: Meeting Challenges in the Global Economy: Report of the Commonwealth Secretariat / World Bank Joint Task Force on Small States. – London, Washington, D. C. : Commonwealth Secretariat, World Bank, 2000. – 127 p.

Codrington H. Country Size and Taxation in Developing Countries / Harold Codrington // The Journal of Development Studies. – 1989. – Vol. 25. – № 4. – P. 508-520. doi: 10.1080/00220388908422126.

Sattler Th. Gravitation or Discrimination? Determinants of Litigation in the World Trade Organisation / Thomas Sattler, Thomas Bernauer // European Journal of Political Research.

– 2011. – № 50. – P. 143-167. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01924.x.

Walters J. Power in WTO Dispute Settlement / Jefferey Walters // Journal of Third World Studies. – 2011. – Vol. XXVIII. – № 1. – P. 169-183.

Shapiro I. Asymmetric Capabilities in Trade Negotiations: Suggestions for Helping the Smaller Economies in the FTAA Process [Electronic Resource] / Ira Shapiro and Robert Cassidy. – Washington D. C. Inter-American Development Bank, 2002. – Mode of Access:

http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=604912.

Ahmadi-Esfahani F. Z. Is Strategic Trade Policy Relevant for a Small Country [Electronic Resource] / Fredoun Z. Ahmadi-Esfahani, Roland G. Stanmore / Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society 1994 Conference (38th), February 8-10, 1994, Wellington, New Zealand. – Mode of Access: http://purl.umn.edu/148014.

Published

2016-10-30